View from the South – West Ham United vs Birmingham City

I had arranged to meet up with Chris and Will in London for a pre-match pint and I managed to get away from work albeit later than I would have liked but still in plenty of time. I had told Jonny, my eldest son to get himself on the train and meet me at Waterloo. The thing about public transport in this country is that at the end of the day, it tends to be overpriced and totally unreliable. I should have had plenty of time had the train I was to catch from Guildford turned up when it should. As it panned out, it arrived just before the next one and then took nearly twice as long to get to London. Jonny’s train from Farnborough came in a couple of minutes later and we the travelled together to the Dirty Dick pub at Liverpool Street.

It was now getting on towards seven o’clock and it was clear that we had to get a move on so no time to grab a drink. To add insult to injury, Chris told me that he had got me a pint in but as I was late he’d drunk it; it was his fifth and he was feeling good! “Yow drank my pint!” I exclaimed horrified. “Yeah,” said Chris with an inane grin on his face that only those that are well on the way to getting inebriated possess. “Mind yow, it was a bit warm and flat by the time I necked it since yow was late,” continued Chris. That was typical I thought; drinks my pint and then has the temerity to complain about it! Will, of course, never short of a word at times like this interjected, “well it’s yow’er own fault for being late” which was a bit rich coming from someone who makes every late tackle look positively punctual!

Will and Chris continued to torment me mercilessly all the way to Upton Park tube station, the banter fuelled handsomely by their respective blood alcohol levels. The train was delayed by the number of passengers at Upton Park according to the driver; no s**t Sherlock! Amazing isn’t it? There is a major cup semi-final being played and the organisation is taken by surprise! This meant that by the time we got to the ground, queued to get in, the match had already been going for ten minutes. I was fiercely reminded as to whose fault that was of course!

We did get in just in time to see Blues go behind however which lowered the mood even more; hungry, tired after a day’s work and with one of my so-called mates having drunk my pint, the sight of the West Ham attack being all over us like a swarm of insects was not good viewing. Noble pounced in the 13th minute. The midfielder’s run and cross found Obinna, whose header was cleared off the line. Spector pinged the ball back across the goal where Noble had time to steady himself with Liam Ridgewell ball watching and failing to close the midfielder down. Noble still had the most impossible of angles but he caught it beautifully on the half volley. The fierce drive squeezed between Scott Dann and Ben Foster on the near post as the sheer pace on the ball found the net. Whilst a lovely strike this was a truly horrible piece of defending and a dreadful goal to concede. 

West Ham should have added to their tally before half-time. Jonathan Spector’s fierce shot was punched behind by Foster, who then saved well from James Tomkins’ header from the resulting corner. Foster brilliantly pushed Obinna’s near-post drive behind following a swift break, Freddie Sears volleyed Julien Faubert’s cross wide and over from 25 yards. West Ham were simply all over Blues at this stage with the home side’s pace and movement too much for Blues’ ragged defenders. Blues were struggling with lack of tempo and the 4-5-1 formation that has served us so badly on so many occasions now. I don’t know how many times I have to keep saying this but Cameron Jerome is not the type of player who can hold the ball up top for you. He needs support and someone to play off and for this formation to be effective you have to have pace and width and be prepared to move the play forward and not sit deep.

There was precious little of any of these qualities from Blues in the first half last night. Blues mustered a tame side-footed effort from Gardner and a looping header from Scott Dann neither of which troubled the West Ham defence and Blues were lucky to be only 1-0 down at the break. To compound matters, Dann pulled up moments before the break with what appeared to be a hamstring injury and left the field on a stretcher. He was replaced by David Murphy during the interval with Ridgewell reverting to centre-half and Birmingham came out a different side. The tempo increased, Hleb, Gardner and Ferguson moved the play up the pitch more and the wide men got up in support of Jerome who almost equalised in the 55th minute when his bullet header from Larsson’s corner was cleared off the line by Sears. It was to be a brief respite for the home side as two minutes later with Birmingham in the ascendancy another Larsson corner saw Ridgewell get in front of his marker, Winston Reid to power home a header for a deserved leveller.

Obinna then inexplicably back heeled Sebastian Larsson in the nether regions off the ball and after briefly consulting his assistant, referee Phil Dowd brandished a red card. Blues, already now on top used the extra man effectively and there looked to be only one winner at this stage. Ridgewell might have scored a second but strayed narrowly offside heading too close to Green. As dominant as West Ham had been in the first period they were being outplayed in the second and parity was only preserved by pretty desperate defending. Blues were denied a clear penalty when Upson shoved Barry Ferguson in the back as he shaped to shoot. I was near the front and saw this incident clearly; it was deemed a shoulder to shoulder challenge by Phil Dowd; No way, Jose! I don’t know how many times this season I have had to report similar incidents but the statistics show that Blues have not had a single penalty awarded this season in the Premier League and only one in our cup run; against Villa in the last round. It simply defies credulity that our appeals keep being waved away when some of the ridiculous awards against us are considered. This incident was one of the most blatant so far this season.

Avram Grant threw on Cole and Zavon Hines for Frederic Piquionne and Sears before Murphy headed a glorious chance from Larsson’s perfect cross wide. He really should have scored and salt was about to be rubbed in the wounds. The 10 men finally managed a shot through Winston Reid’s weak effort and, amazingly, retook the lead totally against the run of play 12 minutes from time when Cole’s even tamer effort from Spector’s cross deflected through Roger Johnson’s legs and then between Foster’s, with the keeper wrong-footed. It was a Robert Green moment for Ben Foster who had otherwise had a good game.

Birmingham continued to press and replaced the tiring Alexander Hleb with Jean Beausejour, and Larsson with Nikola Zigic. Once again, this was a change that should have happened much earlier than 87 minutes as West Ham looking so suspect from set pieces could have been tested more. I felt Fahey should have been the man to make way rather than Larsson whose deliveries into the box caused West Ham trouble all evening. Zigic had only one real chance nodding just wide in the closing moments as Blues poured forward. Blues had lost a game they really should have won on their second half showing though it is fair to say that West Ham were worth at least a 1-0 lead at half-time so perhaps a draw would have been a just result. There is now work to do in the return leg and Blues have made things far more difficult than they should have but I believe that they will prevail in front of a partisan St Andrews in two weeks time. This narrow defeat may turn out to be a blessing as it will ensure an attacking intent from us from the outset. Avram Grant probably has his stay of execution; Napoleon would have liked him in his army as did he not say he preferred a lucky general to a good one?

The Good: The second half performance but this was a fantastic opportunity missed to put the tie firmly in our hands.
The Bad: Our passing, lack of tempo, lack of penetration and predictability in the first half; dreadful defending for West Ham’s opener.
The Ugly: Firstly, the 4-5-1 set up by Blues in the first half; I thought we weren’t going to park the bus! We shouldn’t even try because we are rubbish at it! Secondly, the winning goal which was an absolute farce. Finally, Obinna’s cowardly kick out at Larsson; he deserved his red card.

KRO SOTV

West Ham United: Robet Green 7, Julien Faubert 7, Winston Reid 6, James Tomkins 8, Matthew Upson 7, Scott Parker 8, Jonathan Spector 7, Mark Noble 7 (Radoslav Kovac, 90, N/A), Freddie Sears 8 (Zavon Hines, 74, 6), Frederic Piquionne 6 (Carlton Cole, 73, 7), Victor Obinna 6 (sent-off 59). Subs (Not Used): Ruud Boffin, Luis Boa Morte, Frank Nouble, Jordan Spence.
Goals: Noble (13), Cole (78)
Booked: None
Sent-off: Obinna (59)

Birmingham City: Ben Foster 6, Stephen Carr 8, Roger Johnson 7, Scott Dann 6 (David Murphy, 46, 7), Liam Ridgewell 7; Sebastian Larsson 8 (Nikola Zigic, 87, N/A), Craig Gardner 7, Barry Ferguson 7, Keith Fahey 6; Alexander Hleb 8 (Jean Beausejour 83, N/A); Cameron Jerome 7. Subs (Not Used): Maik Taylor, Matt Derbyshire, Jordon Mutch, Martin Jiranek.
Goals: Ridgewell (56)
Booked: None

Referee: Phil Dowd (Staffordshire) 8; apart from the penalty incident which in my view he got totally wrong, I thought the referee and his assistants had a good game.

Discuss this post, and other items, in the Joys and Sorrows Forum.

Share

16 Comments on View from the South – West Ham United vs Birmingham City

  1. Excellent report, summed up the game perfectly! Do you really think we will go through now? I think our best shot was last night after the sending off, we have only beaten top flight opposition by 2 goals once in almost 60 games and that was Blackpool! God forbid that West Ham score an early goal! I hope I am wrong but I can’t see it happening, best chance will probably be penalties.

  2. Well written blog. It will be an exciting return leg in the cup for both sides.

    Good luck with the rest of the season (as long as it’s not at our expense) – COYI.

  3. Considering that you were late, this is a very biased veiw from someone who obviously was sat too close to the pitch and did not get the full extent of this game. And good on the bloke who drank your pint!!!!!

  4. A little unfair SussexIron.

    I don’t think these Cockneys like your reports Baz…… But my brother liked your beer. lol

  5. Sorry you think that Sussex, I watched the game and thought that Baz has summed it up pretty well. Which part do you think he was being biased about?

    I have to say we normally get pretty positive comments from opposing fans over our reports.

  6. Thank you all for your comments. Sussex, I’m afraid I refute the accusation of bias. I am my own team’s worst critic at times and if the other side are the better I waste no time in saying so. West Ham were the better side by a country mile in the first half and I intimate this in my report but in the second period there is no doubt Hammers were on the back foot and you were very fortunate to win this game in the end. A combination of missed chances, a poor decision for the penalty and good old fashioned misfortune combined to deny Birmingham at least a draw and keeps your team in the tie. May the best team prevail in a fortnight’s time but I believe Blues will on the evidence of the season so far. Biased or not that is my view and you are entitled to yours.

  7. Why oh why oh why does AM continue to play 4-5-1 and over protect a defence that, in AM’s words is one of, if not the best in the Premiership. It all leads to negativity and if, as last night, the players decide to shut up shop and play deep it means we just don’t turn up. In the second half the midfield moved up a bit, no choice as we were 1-0 down, and a diferent team emerges but CJ is not the man to play as a lone forward and our midfield are not quick enough for this formation even if we did have a centre forward who could hold the ball up. I am not advocating a Kevin Keegan scenario of attack to the expense of everything else but please, please can we try and win the second leg not just stop wet spam from scoring and hope we sneak one.

  8. spot on report mate!!! very disappointed with starting line up,i know its a two legged tie,but really felt we should have gone at west ham,upson at left back!!! jerome carnt hold the ball up,and can anyone tell me what Fahey dose,except pass it sideways!

  9. KevB , ‘fraid not … We had our chance , second half we were on the ascendency , got a good goal , they went down to 10 men , and they wobbled big time , didn’t look like scoring and ……… we LOST !
    Work it out Kev , last time they came to St Andrews they went 2 up , quite comfortably , and still pressed for a THIRD goal , a lesson was learnt ( you would think ) but this time Wembley beckons , they’ll roll in ( in the driving seat ) watch us mess about for ANOTHER 45 mins , pick us off on the break , and batton down the hatches against our marauding platoon of strikers for 20 mins or so , game over.

    ps I don’t blame Foster for either goal . ‘Love him !

  10. I told a West Ham fan at work today that I thought we’d blown our chance and that they would win the tie. His response was “Did you not see us away at Newcastle last week?”.

  11. If we were 3-1 down I’d agree with you TR7, but we are only 1 down and you know what happened last time we went into a second leg of a semi of this competition. (Ipswich were better than West Ham too!)

  12. I have done some research on the game and these are the statistics which do not lie and taking into account that West Ham only had 10 men for the majority of the 2nd half, just to prove how wrong your veiw of this game was.

    Game Statitics
    West Ham – Birmingham
    Goal Attempts
    13 – 8
    On Target
    8 – 3
    Corners
    7 – 7
    Offside
    4 – 5
    Fouls
    13 – 8
    Yellow Cards
    0 – 0
    Red Cards
    1 – 0

    Read more: http://www.westham.vitalfootball.co.uk/stats.asp?a=228035#ixzz1ArPXjYd3

  13. So what’s your point my friend? The majority of your shots on goal were in the 1st half, (except 2) and ours were in the 2nd. I notice you didn’t add posession which I believe we had the greater of over the whole game. You were better in the 1st, we were better in the 2nd. To be fair you only won the game because of an error, (which wouldn’t normally happen). A draw would have been a fair result.

    BUT, we take the defeat on the chin and look forward to the 2nd leg when hopefully we’ll turn the deficit around.

    Just to finish my comment, these things are seen by different sets of fans in different ways. I have no problem with you disagreeing with Bazz’s report, but I believe you are being unfair to call his report biased. A number of your fellow fans would appear to disagree with you.

    Thank you for taking the time to comment though mate. 🙂

    Kev

  14. Well my two cents worth is that whenever you don’t play to win you are playing to lose, which is just what happened; I refer here to the formation. Please forgive my somewhat black and white view of this which is no doubt shaped by the fact that I have lived in the States for the last 30 years. It seems to me that this is one where the tactical approach was all wrong and we paid the price for it. OK the second goal for the hammers was the result of a howler by Ben Foster but they all count the same. Why in the world would we take a cautious approach to this one when you consider who we are playing and the fact that there is a second leg?

    With regard to the penalty I had considered the “no-call” to be perhaps due to the fact that Ferguson’s final touch had perhaps been a tad heavy and maybe he had lost some control. No question about the shove in the back but I have seen many penalties not given because the player was not realistically in a scoring situation. This one was not that clear cut but it’s just a thought.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.