View from the South – Stoke City vs Birmingham City

Drat and double drat!

Here is Baz’s view from the armchair!

Originally, I had tickets to go and see this game live but it became clear last week that with work commitments for everyone concerned that things were likely to be tight in terms of time at best and most likely to be guaranteed to miss a chunk of the game. I got a refund therefore and resolved to watch the match with my sons, Will and Chris in one of our local pubs. Well everyone knows the one about ‘the best laid plans of mice and men’ and all that; in the end it all never seemed to happen and it was a case of watching the game on SKY at home with my lads.

At the time of writing I cannot put into words just how disappointed I am not so much with the defeat but the fact that once again we played mediocre rubbish for two thirds of the game and waited an hour before making a substitution that in my humble opinion could have been made after twenty minutes. Beausejour gave one of the worst performances by a Blues player for as long as I can remember and there have been some candidates for that dubious accolade as we all know. He looked woefully off the pace, got caught in possession repeatedly, was clueless when it came to tracking back and helping his full back and as for going forward; someone needs to tell him that for most of the time he was on the pitch he was facing the wrong way! When he got it he turned and passed it backwards; not once did he run at a defender or attempt to take anyone on. He is supposed to be an international winger!

Stoke were by far the better side for the first hour of the game without exactly outplaying us. They deservedly led at half time and it could have been more than the 1-0 score line although it has to be said that the goal resulted from a very unlucky deflection into the path of Huth who smashed the ball virtually at Foster but the shot had too much on it for the keeper to repel it. It wasn’t until Alex McLeish made the much needed substitution of Fahey for Beausejour that some control of midfield started to occur. The tempo increased and Blues started to assert themselves and were the better side for the rest of the match. Jerome got in behind the shaky Stoke defence but crossed weakly only for Etherington to clip the ball against his own post. A melee followed where shots rained in on the home team’s goal and the feeling that an equaliser must follow was snuffed out by a breakaway against the run of play on 71 minutes. Ricardo Fuller was allowed to run too far from the half way line and was not closed down. He beat two defenders as he turned inside too easily but the strike into the far corner was sublime and worthy of winning any game.

It seemed it was game over but within five minutes Blues were level with two excellent strikes of their own from Fahey, who having come on was one of the best players on the pitch at this juncture and Cameron Jerome with a well directed header from Larsson’s superb cross. Fahey’s volley, having controlled the ball on his chest on the edge of the area, was a lovely goal and as graceful as Fuller’s had been. So 2-2 and all to play for and it was Blues who were looking the most likely to win it with about 15 minutes left. Several chances came and went for Blues including a point blank header from Johnson that was unfortunately straight at Begovic allowing the keeper to push the attempt over the bar when it really should have been 3-2. Then calamity struck; this is Birmingham City after all and we above all know how to clutch defeat from the jaws of victory! With only five minutes on the clock, a now rare attack by Stoke resulted in a weak cross from Etherington on their left wing. Somehow Barry Ferguson managed to toe the ball and deflect it between the legs of Scott Dann to the only Stoke player in our box surrounded by four defenders and the keeper. That player was Whitehead who pounced and the ball bobbled into the net for the winner.

I am feeling very low just at this moment like I suspect most Blues fans who watched this game at the stadium or on the telly. In the final half an hour Birmingham had enough chances to have won three games let alone this one. Stoke were very fortunate with two of their goals to get lucky deflections but over the piece they deserved their victory because we played rubbish for the first two thirds of this game just as we did against West ham on Saturday. We simply cannot afford to keep doing this. If we continue to miss gilt edged chances when they occur and then defend as badly as we did for their winner we will get relegated. We have Manchester City away next followed by Chelsea at home and the way we are playing, I fear the worst. There are worse teams than us in the Premier League I believe but none of them as far as I can see are only turning up for thirty minutes in any given match. Poor though we were for the majority of this game; this was a match we could and should have won even if we would not necessarily have deserved it – I’m gutted.

Finally, I feel it was disgraceful for Jamie Rednapp to suggest before the game that if a close penalty call should occur for Stoke that it will probably be given. Mr Clattenburg deserves a word of praise tonight as it appeared to me that he was uninfluenced by the bleating of Tony Pulis about decisions that have gone against his team so far this season however justified he may be. I commented about this in a previous post but despite that fact that Blues have arguably had just as many abysmal decisions given against them over the season so far, there have been no complaints from our manager who has accepted every setback with dignity and equanimity. I thought Mr Clattenburg refereed the game extremely well and did not appear to give way to pressure or home crowd bullying.

The Good: Superb goals from Ricardo Fuller and Keith Fahey; an excellent fight back from Blues in an entertaining last half hour.

The Bad: The dross we produced for the first hour and in particular Beausejour’s performance which was epic in its awfulness; should have been given the hook much much earlier.

The Ugly: The winning goal! Dreadful defending even if the tiny deflection that led to it was unlucky.

Stoke City (4-4-2) Goals: Huth 44, Fuller 71, Whitehead 85

Begovic 7 Huth 8 Faye 6 Higginbotham 6 Collins 6 Pennant 7 (Whelan 73, 6) Whitehead 7 Etherington 8 (Wilson 90 N/A) Jones 7 Fuller 9 (Walters 90+4, N/A)

Birmingham City (4-4-2) Goals: Fahey 73, Jerome 76

Foster 6 Carr 7 Johnson 6 Dann 6 Ridgewell 7 Larsson 6 Gardner 8 Fergusson 8 Beausejour 3 (Fahey 61, 7) Zigic 5 Jerome 6

Discuss this post, and other items, in the Joys and Sorrows Forum.


5 Comments on View from the South – Stoke City vs Birmingham City

  1. Well over here accross the pond I do not get to see the Blue boys very often; the last time was against Arsenal but I keep close tabs over the ether. While no one would seriously expect the lads in Blue to get anything from that kind of game, it’s getting very worrying that we are not taking all three points from those teams that we really should beat, especially if we have higher aspirations that should befit one of the two major teams from England’s second city (I note West Brom is also in the Prem but technically not part of Birmingham; fair play to those boys by the way for their season so far). I must agree with my older brother Baz, whose skills at both detailed analysis and wordsmithing far exceed my own, in that we simply cannot continue with this run of apparently dour form. Even the good teams have an off night (such as the manchester derby played earlier tonight which apparently was a quite insipid affair) but for us it seems to be becoming a disturbing habit and one which will indeed get us relegated if we don’t turn it around.

    With reference to my learned brother’s earlier comments about refereeing, I would like to make a comment based upon my 30 years of observation of major sports here in the US. Now before anyone gets on my case about the obvious differences between football and the major american sports (Amercian Football, Baseball, Basketball and Ice Hockey) it’s interesting to note that those sports have made rule changes and officiating set-up changes that have benefitted the respective game. I realize that it is easier to make those kinds of things happen over here cos you don’t have a world body involved with its attendent foot dragging and general ineptness but still it seems that adding one or two more officials such as say two extra linesmen to cover the entire length of the pitch on both sides at the same time seems way overdue. Or maybe an assistant who is also on the field of play and can blow a whistle also. Now before you all say that this will slow the game down because of too many stoppages I believe that it will serve to keep players more honest especially in regard to the controversial issue of penalty awards. I’m just thinking out loud with these suggestions but the bottom line is that football has to recognize that changes are needed due to issues such as: the faster pace of the modern game and the obscene amounts of money involved, especially in the Prem and Europe, which directly lead to cheating and gaining an advantage at any cost. The powers that be need to get in the 21st century and quit officiating the game like it was done 50 years ago (or maybe even before that). Having said this though I seriously doubt that the smelly-socks bunch at FIFA or the FA will do anything about it. So long as the money keeps flowing and the same few teams keep winning everything (by the way I have an idea to fix that but it will have to wait for another time) it will be business as usual.

  2. Thank you for that Kev! 😛 Yes I think my baby brother Trev (all 6 foot 4 and 17 stone of him!) makes very valid points. He has always said that the key to stability in the Premier League is that you have to beat the teams you should beat (i.e. Wigan and West Ham at home) to survive. I confess to be very concerned at the moment because when we play well in snippets we look a decent outfit but we cannot keep doing it for only 25-30 minutes in a game. Kev, if Trev has a view on how to fix the grossly unfair oligarchy that we have in this country perhaps he may wish to pen a formal article for us?


  3. Kev, I would indeed be interested, as soon as I find out what “oligarchy” means. Hate to burst your bubble Kev but maybe I’m not that smart but your earlier comment is certainly appreciated. My brother never ceases to amaze me with the odd word that he comes up with that obviously indicates that he reads the Standard Oxford Dictionary way too much. I think I might have to get him a subscription to Playboy instead for Christmas; I’ll bet Hugh Heffner doesn’t know what oligarchy means either and he seems to have had a good life and made a bob or two along the way.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.